Leading practitioners are avoiding the pain, cost and disruption associated with crisis-response, cost-out transformations through continuous organization effectiveness.
We observe two distinct acts to get off the transformation treadmill:
Act One involves Getting Operational Control: Managing the size, cost, structure and composition of the workforce over the 12–18-months business planning and review cycle.
- Establishing key measures which meet the business need for insight
- Unlocking forward-looking insight to visualize the future organization
- Tracking key measures over time and understanding the reasons for changes
- Embedding active management in the business planning and review processes
- Influencing action based on insights
Attention is deliberately focused on delivering tangible business value to overcome change resistance and gain buy-in.
Act Two involves strategic planning over a longer-term time horizon.
- Embedding job architecture to provide the basis for strategic planning
- Revealing the work activities consuming the time and cost of the workforce to identify process optimization opportunities
- Anticipating how the workforce will be impacted by changing work
- Identifying the extent to which people possess the skills needed to perform today, and in the future
- Projecting talent supply and demand to reveal gaps; plan gap-closure actions and track the delivery of workforce plans
Not every transformation is a cost-out transformation, but the data and infrastructure enabling continuous organizational effectiveness provides the foundation for managing strategy-led, change: The baseline is in place to provide detailed insights on the ‘as-is’ organization; Design options can be modeled at speed with immediate impact analysis to see the effect of planned changes; Talent selection processes can be managed at speed and scale without introducing risk, and; The infrastructure exists to track implementation and the delivery of planned outcomes.
Comments
0 comments
Please sign in to leave a comment.